ABSTRACT
Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are rising in low middle income countries (LMICs) mainly driven by cardiometabolic disease (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension). Aim(s): To develop a model of care, based on the chronic care model and collaborative care model, to improve care, outcomes and risk factor control for adults with cardio metabolic disease in LMICs in the Covid-19 era. This will contribute to the sustainable development goals of promoting good health, well-being and reducing inequalities. Method(s): Using an iterative consultative approach with healthcare workers, clients, and community leaders in Kenya, Ghana and Mozambique, we developed a model of care, which includes core features from chronic care models: self-management support;decision support;clinical information systems;delivery system design;and community linkages. Result(s): We produced a culturally adapted self-management education programme, a training package for educators delivering the programme, as well as a training package for community and healthcare professional leaders to increase awareness and self-care for cardiometabolic disease. Given the lack of a robust health information system, we are offering a global registry to provide real world data on patient management and quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Conclusion(s): This intervention will be tested in a mixed-methods single-arm feasibility study in five sites across three African countries: Kenya, Ghana, Mozambique.
ABSTRACT
The diagnosis and management of COVID-19 are much dependent on the adherence to standardized protocols. Healthcare workers play a crucial role in the case management of COVID-19 in many institutions. Globally, the disease burden is increasing, and the mortality has reached over 2 041 426 compared with 323 000 in May 2020. In West Africa, the pandemic has shown a slow but steady rise in many countries. Existing protocols and their utilization are best assessed after the occurrence of the index case. General aim. The study assessed the health worker's response to COVID-19 protocols at three designated areas of the in-hospital management care triaging, holding area, and treatment centers. Method. A qualitative design was used to assess the response of healthcare workers with regards to early case detection, infection prevention, risk communication to clients and compliance to protocols. The study conducted observational visits and purposively selected healthcare workers comprising of clinicians, nurses, emergency medical technicians, and laboratory technicians who perform routine duties at the triaging, holding, and treatment centers. A total of 41 observations were made over two weeks. Results. Participants comprised 23 males and 18 females. At all observed units, the case definition was being used to screen attendants presenting, and appropriate categorization of patients was ensured. The use of temperature in screening for COVID-19 at the units was generally adhered to. Only 50% of participants used the prescribed PPEs. The physical distancing between healthcare workers and client and between clients and caregivers were not enforced; however, hand hygiene was practiced. Disinfection of working surfaces and equipment with 0.5% chlorine or 70% alcohol-based rubs were used most of the time. It was observed however that no psychological counselling was given to suspected cases or their relatives. Conclusion. Healthcare workers showed discordant response to different parts of the protocols for COVID-19 especially appropriate distancing. There was an enhanced awareness among healthcare workers and improvement in infection prevention protocols. The study also observed that as the risk of infection increased from triaging to holding area and to treatment centers, the response of healthcare workers to COVID-19 protocols also improved. Risk communication is an essential part of the COVID-19 management strategy. At the treatment centers, healthcare workers adhered to this protocol, whereas it was a major gap at the triaging and holding areas.